您好,欢迎光临有路网!
英语作为外语的课堂问答话语语用研究(A Pragmatic Study on the EFL Classroom Question-Answer Discourse)
QQ咨询:
有路璐璐:

英语作为外语的课堂问答话语语用研究(A Pragmatic Study on the EFL Classroom Question-Answer Discourse)

  • 作者:傅利
  • 出版社:科学出版社
  • ISBN:9787030227683
  • 出版日期:2008年01月01日
  • 页数:188
  • 定价:¥35.00
  • 分享领佣金
    手机购买
    城市
    店铺名称
    店主联系方式
    店铺售价
    库存
    店铺得分/总交易量
    发布时间
    操作

    新书比价

    网站名称
    书名
    售价
    优惠
    操作

    图书详情

    • 出版社
    • ISBN
      9787030227683
    • 作者
    • 页数
      188
    • 出版时间
      2008年01月01日
    • 定价
      ¥35.00
    • 所属分类
    内容提要
    英语课堂教学需要很多语言交流活动,即课堂言语互动。课堂教学的言语互动主要体现在师生言语互动上,而这种言语互动叉往往通过问与答的形式来完成。《英语作为外语的课堂问答话语语用研究》在运用话语分析的相关理论对课堂问答话语进行静态研究的同时,**运用语用学的主要理论,诸如言语行为、语用前提、合作原则、礼貌原则等,对英语作为外语的课堂问答话语进行了动态研究。
    语用学研究的是特定语境中的特定话语。在外语课堂教学这一具体语境中,教师的话语角色与他们的社会角色既相一致又相矛盾,这种矛盾统一在问答话语中得到充分的体现。一方面教师通过提问、反馈控制课堂话语和话轮;另一方面教师采用很多礼貌言语策略,鼓励学生参与课堂互动。在对课堂问答话语的理解与阐述上,英语作为外语的教学语境起着至关重要的作用。言语行为理论为课堂问答话语实施不同功能提供了理论依据。提问可以使言成功有所为,即通过说出(言内行为)“提问”(次要言外行为)这一言语,间接发出指令(主要言外行为),使听话人按照指令行事(提问的言后行为); “回答”(言内行为),如解释、造句、朗读等(言外行为),同样是按照提问的间接指令在以言行事,满足提问不同的语用前提
    文章节选
    1.3.4 Limitations in data collection There are some limitations in the data collection.Firstly,the present study was based on the tape-recording of two kinds of classes,with no interview and questionnaire being conducted.Secondly,the data were collected through tape-recording of the class,ignoring bodylanguage,such as facial expressions,gestures,etc.,of the subjects.Thirdly,a small amount of the recording was unintelligible and had tobe left alone.These limitations might to some extent affect the data forthe present classroom discourse analysis.
    1.4 Outline of the Book This book is composed of seven chapters.Chapter One provides ageneral introduction to the current research,in which the objectives,the rationale,the methodology and data for the research are stated.Chapter Two presents a brief review of the literature regardingprevious studies of discourse analysis.This chapter introduces theachievements made in discourse analysis,critical discourse analysisand classroom discourse analysis.Chapter Three lays the pragmaticbasis for the research.The contributions of some key theories ofpragmatics,such as speech act theory,indirect speech act theory,presupposition,cooperative principle and politeness principle,areinvestigated and their application in classroom question-answerdiscourse is discussed with the collected data.Chapter Four dealswith the questions in the classroom,introducing the forms ofquestions,relating the features of teacher’S question and discussing itsfunctions,particularly its functions in teaching and learning.ChapterFive addresses the types of answers in relation to the questions.Chapter Six is devoted to the interplay of the question-answerdiscourse on the teacher-student interaction in the EFL classroom.After the demonstration of question-answer structures 30多年前年两位英国语言学家sinclair和COUl廿lard对课堂上的言语活动进行了分析,后来他们把自己的研究结果写成了一部著作并于1975年由牛津大学出版社出版,那是话语分析这个研究领域中早期一部颇有影响的作品--Towards an Analysis of Discourse。两位作者以收集到的课堂言语活动语料为基础,对课堂话语的构成作出了描述,并提出了一个多层的构成模式。不过他们当年对课堂话语所做的研究大体上是描述性的,是静态的。此后随着语用学这一新生领域的产生和壮大,语言研究进入了一个言必称语用的时代。自然,话语分析家也开始把语用融入自己的研究中去了。
    哈尔滨工业大学傅利教授撰写的《英语作为外语的课堂问答话语语用研究》这部专著便是这个研究领域的成果之一。它的标题明白无误地告诉我们它研究的对象是什么,它研究的视角是什么。和30多年前两位英国学者的研究相比较,傅利教授的研究和他们的研究有相同之处,它们两者都以课堂话语为对象,两个研究都是描述性的;但是它们之间又有很大的不同,那就是前者是静态的,后者是动态的。后者的动态性是由它的研究视角决定的,因为它是对课堂问答话语所做的语用研究,而这一研究视角在30多年前恐怕还没有完全进入两位英国学者的视野。用语用这个视角去观察一个看似熟知的现象,我们可以看到许多我们原先所看不到的东西。这正是这部专著的意义和价值所在。作者通过实录课堂教学情景,对课堂里师生之间问答这一特定的话语活动做了描述,但作者并没有就此止步,她接着应用语用学的一系列理论对这个话语活动进行了动态的分析。除了对教师的问题和学生的回答的表面形式、类型和构成作了描述之外,她还对问题的功能、回答的内涵等语用侧面作了分析。
    目录

    Acknowledgements
    Abstract
    内容提要
    Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Objectives of the Study
    1.2 Rationale for the Study
    1.3 Methodology and Data for the Study
    1.3.1 Methodology
    1.3.2 Data collection
    1.3.3 Data description
    1.3.4 Limitations in data collection
    1.4 Outline of the Book

    Chapter 2 Review of Discourse Analysis
    2.1 Discourse Analysis
    2.1.1 Early attempts
    2.1.2 Sociological approach
    2.1.3 Sociolinguistic approach
    2.2 Critical Discourse Analysis
    2.2.1 Discourse as power/knowledge
    2.2.2 Discourse as social practice
    2.2.3 Discourse as(re)production of dominance
    2.2.4 Critique
    2.3 Classroom Discourse Analysis
    213.1Hierarchical rank model
    2.3.2 Instructional phase
    2.3.3 Language classroom research
    2.3.4 Critical analysis of classroom discourse
    2.3.5 Classroom question and answer research
    Summary

    Chapter 3 Pragmatic Theories for the Study
    3.1Context
    3.1.1 What is context?
    3.1.2 The context-bound study
    3.1-3 The context-bound discourse
    3.2 Speech Act Theory
    3.2.1 Speech acts
    3.2 2 Illocutionary acts
    3.2.3 Questions and answers as illocutionary acts
    3.2.4 Questions as indirect directives
    3.2.5 Questions and answers as indirect speech acts
    3.3 Interpersonal Rhetoric
    3.3.1 Cooperative principle(CP)
    3.3.2 Politeness principle(PP)
    3.3.3 Questions as face-threatening acts?
    3.3.4 Answers and silence as face-losing acts?
    Sumary

    Chapter 4 Questions in the EFL Classroom
    4.1 Forms of Questions
    4.1.1 General questions
    4.1.2 Special questions
    4.1.3 Alternative questions
    4.1.4 Disjunctive questions
    4.1.5 Rhetorical questions69
    4.1.6 Declarative and imperative questions‘70
    4.1.7 Shortened forms of questions72
    4.2 Functions of Questions74
    4.2.1 Informative function
    4.2.2 Interpersonal function
    4.2.3 Directive function
    4.2.4 Instructive function
    4.2.5 Exploratory function
    4.3 Features of Teacher’s Questions
    4.3.1 Reiteration of questions
    4.3.2 Simplification of questions
    4.3.3 Clustering of questions
    4.3.4 Self-answering of questions
    Summary

    Chapter 5 Answers in the EFL Classroom
    5.1 Criteria for the Classification of Answers
    5.1.1 Adjacency pair
    5.1.2 Pragmatic presupposition
    5.1.3 Cooperative principle
    5.2 Preferred Second Pair Part
    5.2.1 Adequate answers
    5.2.2 Excessive answers
    5.3 Dispreferred Second Pair Part
    5.3.1 Deficient answers
    5.3.2 Incorrect answers
    5.3.3 Indirect answers
    5.4Zero Second Pajr Part
    5.4.1 Silence and void of action
    5.4.2 Examination of silence
    Summary

    Chapter 6 Question--Answer Structures in the EFL Classroom118
    6.1 Instructional Interaction
    6.1.1 Institutional talk and ordinary talk
    6.1.2 Institutional interaction and classroom interaction120
    6.1.3 Teacher’S domination of tum·taking·122
    6.2 Question·Answer Structures123
    6.2.1 Initiation-Response124
    6.2.2 Initiation-Response-Feedback125
    6.2.3 Initiation-Responselflnitiation2一Feedback/Response2
    6.2.4 Initiation-Response-Feedbackfl2一(Ra·F2f13)
    6.2.5 Initiation-Response(一h-R2)一Feedback
    6.2.6 Initiation-Response-Feedback一(R2Fn)
    6.3 Examination of Question-Answer Structures
    6.3.1 The IRF structure133
    6.3.2 Examination of the initiation
    6.3.3 Examination of the response
    6.3.4 Examination of the feedback
    6.3.5 Extension of the IRF structure
    6.4 Repairs in the Question-Answer Discourse
    6.4.1 Intra-sentence repairs
    6.4.2 Intra-tum repairs
    6.4.3 Inter-rum self-initiated other-repairs
    6.4.4 Inter-tum other-initiated other-repairs
    6.4.5 Tri-tum repairs
    6.4.6 Examination of the repairs
    Summary

    Chapter 7 Conclusion
    7.1 Limitations in the Study
    7.2 Summary of the Study
    7.3 Implications for EFL Teaching
    7.3.1 The role relationship between teacher and student
    7.3.2 The increase of student talk
    7.3.3 The functions of feedback
    7·3·4 The development of students’pragmatic competence
    7.4 Suggestions for Future Research
    Bibliography
    Appendices
    Appendix 1 Transcription Conventions
    Appendix 2 Transcripts of Chapter 5
    Appendix 3 Transcripts of Chapter 6
    ……

    与描述相符

    100

    北京 天津 河北 山西 内蒙古 辽宁 吉林 黑龙江 上海 江苏 浙江 安徽 福建 江西 山东 河南 湖北 湖南 广东 广西 海南 重庆 四川 贵州 云南 西藏 陕西 甘肃 青海 宁夏 新疆 台湾 香港 澳门 海外