zationofexperiences,andtheprovisionforevaluation,hasdominatedthoughtoncurriculumplanningforapproximatelyfortyyears.Moreover,thepublica-tionoftheTylerRationalerepresentsnotthebeginningofitsinfluencebut,in-stead,adistillationofideasderivedfromthefoundersofthecurriculumfieldinthefirstquarterofthiscentury.Infact,Bobbitt'sseminalbooksoncurricu-lum(Bobbitt,1918,1924),andinparticulartheirfocusonthedevelopmentofspecificobjectivesbasedon"scientific"methods,establishedthebasicapproachtocurriculumplanningcontinuedbyTyler.
Sinceitspublicationin1949,educatorsrepresentingawiderangeoforien-tationshaveturnedtotheTylerRationaletoanswerproceduralquestionsofcurriculum.Test-orientedbehavioristssuchasJamesPophamuseitexplicitlyfortheselectionofobjectives(Popham&Baker,1970).Course-planningguides,suchasthosebyPosnerandRudrritsky(1994)andbyBarnes(1982),useelabo-rationsoftheTylerRationaleasthebasisfortheirhandbooks.EvenhumanisticeducatorssuchasElliotEisner(1994),whohavespentconsiderableeffortcriti-cizingTyleresqueobjectivesandevaluationapproaches,whenitcomestimetodiscussprocedure,revert,perhapsunknowingly,toastep-by-stepapproachthatdiffersonlyslightlyfromtheTylerRationale.
PerhapsthemajorreasonfortheTylerRationale'sdominanceisitscongru-encewithourassumptionsaboutbothschoolingandcurriculumplanning.Unquestionedacceptanceoftheseassumptionsevenmakesitimpossibletoconceiveofanalternativetothisbasicapproach.Schoolingisassumedtobeaprocesswhosemainpurposeistopromoteorproducelearning.Studentsaretermed"learners";objectivesareconceivedintermsofdesirablelearning;eval-uationoftheschool'ssuccessistargetedalmostexclusivelyatachievementtestscores;"educational"goalsaredistinguishedfrom"noneducational"goalsbydeterminingiftheycanbeattributedtolearning;5"curriculum"isdefined(notbyTylerbutbyhisfollowers,suchasGoodlad)intermsof"intendedlearningoutcomes"(Goodlad&Richter,1966).Thus,schoolingisconceivedasaproduc-tionsystem,inwhichindividuallearningoutcomesaretheprimaryproduct.Afterall,iflearningis
…… 现代西方教育思想不仅源流学派异彩纷呈,而且显示出深层转变并日益走向综合发展的趋势;同时,这一令人捉摸难定的趋势,又隐约展示出深刻的历史渊源、文化背景以及学理的传承相继。我国教育理论界历来重视对国外**教育思想的引入和借鉴,从赫尔巴特教学法到凯洛夫的教育学,从杜威的进步主义教育运动到后现代主义教育思潮等等应时而生的教育思想都对我国教育理论界产生了或大或小或,显或隐的影响。可以说,我国教育理论界从来没有“闭关锁国”、“妄;自尊大”的夜郎心态,总是自觉地融人世界教育理论发展的潮流之中。